Skip Navigation Links

Time to reassess the Fieldcrest building issue

November 20, 2015   Editor: Dave Uphoff
The decision by the Fieldcrest Board of Education to delay until November 2016 a referendum on a bond issue to pay for a new 6 - 12 school building was a reasonable thing to do. Fieldcrest Superintendent Dr. Dan Oakley said at the last school board meeting that after meeting with the public to discuss the building issue he acquired more information that must be taken into consideration. We don't know exactly what Dr. Oakley learned but he and the school board obviously have to know that the public is not in favor of a new building.

The delay gives time for the school board and the public to take a breather and sit back and reassess this whole situation. We know being on the school board is a difficult task and we respect those who give of their time to help resolve school problems and give guidance. But members of the school board must also listen to what the public has to say. The school board's determination to go ahead with a new building plan in spite of 2 surveys that indicate a new building is not what the public wants, sends a message to the public that the school board is ignoring the public and treating the public as though it is not informed enough to make a decision on the building issue.

The board still maintains that it is cheaper to build new than renovate in spite of research that shows renovation is cheaper in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania. The board said this was an unfair comparison to Illinois costs because Illinois is different without explaining why it is different. If renovation costs are higher in Illinois, it stands to reason that building cost are higher also. It is the relative cost of renovation to building new that is important.

A letter was addressed to this website last week stating that the future of education does not lie in more bricks and mortar but more on online and internet education. We mentioned this as a factor in an editorial last May. The gradual conversion to online education is a more important goal for the future than constructing new buildings. It will result in lower cost and better education for our students.

Declining enrollment and increasing costs are the plague of rural school districts, especially in a broke state like Illinois. Taxpayers are in no mood for tax increases, especially in Illinois which has the second highest property tax rate in the country behind New Jersey. If a referendum is passed for a $20 million dollar building, our taxes would go up a minimum of 13%.

The board gives the impression that the school's interests take priority over the community's interest. However, the school is part of the community, not the other way around and the community's interest must come first. Even if renovation and rebuilding cost were similar, each community would prefer to keep their school buildings.

We urge the Fieldcrest Board of Education to reconsider its decision to build a 6-12 building at a new campus site. It is the public's opinion that it will be cheaper to renovate and will be better for the communities. Voters assume that the board was elected to represent their interest and want the board to stand behind that commitment.

The taxpayers should have the last say in the building issue. We don't want to waste taxpayer dollars by going through the motions of developing a building plan that will not pass a referendum. Now is the time to admit to that and develop a plan that the taxpayers will approve.

To reply to this editorial in the email section click here

Your letter will be published in the email section. Viewers are welcome to submit a guest editorial.


Comments

Pattie Ong: Agree! Excellent editorial.

Cam N LeAnn-Junker: Keri, I'm honestly glad I don't live in the district anymore. I would hate to have to deal with all of this. I don't know enough to voice one way or the other. I just know this would be hard to deal with either way. You can come to Bloomington.

Submit your comments

You must log in with a registration ID to be able to submit comments. If you do not have an ID click here.

User ID:      

Password: