October 25, 2004
About
Town


Dave Uphoff

  Past Editorials
  Click here
  Links

 Home
 About Minonk
 Alumni
 Businesses
 Births
 Cemetery
 Chatter box
 City Hall
 Community Ctr
 Classified Ads
 Editorial
 Email
 Events
 Genealogy
 History
 Homepages
 Issues
 Library
 Lost & Found
 Map
 News
 Obituaries
 Photos
 Recipes
 Reference
 Satire
 Schools
 Search
 Sports
 Stories
 Trees
 Where are they?
 
History Links

 Home
 Buildings
 Businesses
 Coal mine
 Early Settlers
 Ethnic Groups
 Origins
 People
 Old Photos
 Sports
 Tragedies
 

Decision time on referendum

The most important issue facing the Minonk area in the election on November 2 is the Fieldcrest referendum which is asking for a $0.55 increase in the school tax. What I will attempt to do is summarize what I feel are the facts and let you make the decision.

First, the facts as presented to us by the Fieldcrest administration:

1. Due to the State of Illinois' reliance on property tax to fund education and due to declining farmland values, most school districts in Illinois are being underfunded and have serious financial problems. This year Fieldcrest will receive $263,000 less in property tax revenue. In addition, increases in insurance and operating expenses have contributed to higher costs.

2. Fieldcrest has made $1,177,000 in cuts to programs and personnel in the last two years which reduced the teaching staff by 16%, although it seems apparent that some of the cuts will be reinstated due to mandates.

3. Fieldcrest stopped funding all extra-curricular activities in 2004-2005. $191,574 has been collected from the private sector to help fund these activites. Of this, $146,754 was raised through activity and participation fees paid by parents of students who pay a $200 activity fee and $150 participation fee for each sport.

4. The Fieldcrest school board approved the issuing of $750,000 of working cash bonds last December in order to meet expenses.

5. Fieldcrest total tax rate of 4.8055 is in the bottom 1/3 of area schools ranking 13th out of 18 schools.

4. Illinois remains a low-tax state, ranking in the bottom third of all states in total state and local tax burden.

The other facts that you should consider are:

1. The City of Wenona's TIF district has resulted in the lost of tax revenue to the Fieldcrest School district since 1994. Last year alone, $257,230 went into the Wenona TIF district that normally would have gone to Fieldcrest. About half of this money is recovered through subsidies from the state. However, the lost dollars are still being subsidized by taxpayers.

2. The Fieldcrest Board of Education twice has failed to approve a measure that would result in the creation of attendance centers that would have consolidated classes and reduced costs. The last proposal would have saved $75,000 to $125,000 annually.

3. The State of Illinois is considering House Bill 750 which would increase school funding and give some property tax relief. The bill, if passed, will increase state funding to 51%, increase the education Foundation Level by $1,000 per student, and reduce the property tax burden by $2.5 billion state-wide. At this stage no one knows the likelihood of the bill being approved .

If the proposed referendum is defeated, these are some of the possible effects.

1. The District will have to maintain little or no increases for salaries, keep high extracurricular and activity fees and provide fewer opportunities for children. Elementary Art and Physical Education would not be reinstated and Elementary South would have to share a building principal with Wenona and Toluca grade sites.

2. The school board may be forced to institute attendance centers, consolidate class rooms and perhaps close some buildings.

3. The school board may have to negotiate with the City of Wenona to ammend its TIF district so that Fieldcrest will get more of the tax dollars currently lost to the school from Wenona's TIF.

4. Further staff cuts may have to be made.

5. Property taxes will not be affected.

6. Fieldcrest may come under the control of the State if its financial situation worsens.

6. Some or all of the above may not occur if the state passes the proposed bill to improve school funding or if farmland values improve quickly.

If the proposed referendum is approved, these are some of the possible effects.

1. Activity and participation fees can be reduced or eliminated, salaries can be improved which should help attract and keep a high quality teaching staff.

2. The school will not have to keep paying $80,000 interest per year on borrowed money to meet expenses.

3. The school can balance its budget and possibly be removed from the State's Financial Watch List.

4. The average property tax will increase by $110. An owner of a $100,000 home will have an increase of $181 in property taxes.

After digesting the above information, your decision really comes down to this. A vote for the referendum means that you feel that the Fieldcrest School District has made it best effort to reduce costs and that you want to make sure that education of our students will not be impaired. A vote against the referendum means that you feel that Fieldcrest School District has not made its best effort to reduce cost and they will now be forced to make the hard decisions to make the school district more efficient and cost conscious.


To reply to this editorial please send your comments to Your letter will be published in the email section. Viewers are welcome to submit a guest editorial.