|
March 29, 2003 |
|
About Town Dave Uphoff |
![]() |
|
Past Editorials
|
|
Click here
|
|
Links
|
|
Home About Minonk Alumni Businesses Cemetery Chatter box City Hall Community Ctr Editorial Events Genealogy History Homepages Issues Library Lost & Found Map News Obituaries Photos Reference Satire Schools Search Stories Where are they? |
|
History Links
|
|
Home Buildings Businesses Coal mine Early Settlers Ethnic Groups Origins People Old Photos Sports Tragedies |
Fieldcrest tax referendumIt is that time again to exercise our priviledge of living in a democracy. I urge everyone to get out and vote on Tuesday, April 1. There are plenty of issues to vote on this year, especially the Fieldcrest tax referendum.Much discussion and many letters have been published on this website and in local newspapers so that everyone should be aware of what the issues are regarding the Fieldcrest tax referendum. The Fieldcrest school board is asking for a $.90 increase in the education fund tax rate. The increased tax rate, if passed, will help the school district to overcome a reduction in state funding partly due to a decrease in farm land assessment values for this area. In addition, the state is facing a sizable budget deficit and may cut education funding even further. To help meet expenses for the next school year, the school administration is proposing cuts totaling $608,016. The cuts would include reductions in administration, programs at all levels and extra curriculars. Even with these cuts, the school will still face a deficit of $250,000 for next year. Therefore, if the tax referendum is passed a deficit can be avoided. If not, the school must make additional cuts or be forced to borrow money which will add additional costs in the form of interest payments. Fieldcrest is not alone in its financial woes. About 80% of the school districts in the state are experiencing a financial crisis. Fieldcrest's current rate of $2.97 is second lowest in the Midstate Conference and it's cost per student is $6,574 to the state average of $7,926. Even though Fieldcrest appears to have been been fiscally responsible compared to other schools, with the state of the economy, people do not want to cough up hundreds of dollars extra per year on their property taxes. The biggest problem facing Fieldcrest is that even though we have a quality school system, it is not supported by a commensurate tax base. In other words, we are in a relatively poor district. It does not do any good to claim that school districts overspent when times were good and did not save for the rainy day that we all face now. We all are guilty of that crime. As individuals we've had to cut back and so will the school district. It is in times like these that we are forced to examine what really is important in our education system. As a former athlete I find no problem in cutting back on sports before we cut music, art, or vocational trades. You the voter must decide how important education is to our community, realizing that the quality of a community is directed related to the quality of the school system. Looking at it this way, a poor school system will lower property values and we lose again. On the other hand, you must also consider if additional cuts can be made without compromising the quality of education in our schools. If you vote for the tax referendum, Fieldcrest will not have to remain on the state's "Financial Early Warning" list and it will be able to regain financial solvency for the foreseeable future. In addition, many of our extra curriculars can be retained, the quality of education can hopefully be maintained and we can continue to attract good teachers. In addition, your taxes will increase anywhere from $100 to $500 per year depending on how much property you own. If you vote no for the referendum, you are saying that Fieldcrest can make additional cuts that will not seriously damage the quality of education. It means that Fieldcrest will have to make some real hard decisions that may mean elimation of sports and having them funded by civic groups. To some people it may mean an opportunity to cut the "fat" out of the system. It means avoiding an increase in property taxes. Finally, it means that you feel that the State of Illinois must come up with a better way of funding education rather than throwing it on the backs of the property owners each time there is a financial crisis. You make the decision. |
Fire district trusteeThose who have been watching this website are probably aware of the controversy over the fire district trustee candidates. Firemen Steve White and Chris McKay are running for fire district trustee against David Timmerman and Jerry Barth. The controversy centers around the fact that both White and McKay are firemen and many feel that it is a conflict of interest for them to also be a trustee for the fire district. There is no law against them running so it is perfectly legitimate. It is up to the voters to decide for themselves who the best candidate is by asking the candidates what their goals and objectives are as a fire district trustee.City electionIn the city aldermanic race, only Ward 2 has a real race. Wards 1 and 3 each only have one candidate running which reflects the level of apathy towards politics in our community.In Ward 2, incumbment Ron Redenius is facing a challenge from Mike May and Tyler Witte for a two year appointment to the council to complete the term of the original alderman Sean Cunningham who moved to another ward. From comments that I heard at the "Meet the Candidates Night", I feel safer with Ron Redenius who is definitely against a landfill in Section Six. The other two candidates had an open mind toward the landfill although that does not necessarily mean that they would vote for it. Nevertheless, I spent three years of my life fighting the landfill and I do not want to see the efforts of those who spent so much of their time fighting the landfill have their efforts be in vain. The four year term in Ward 2 has no formal candidates printed on the ballot. Instead, there will be two write-in candidates, incumbment Dean Barth, and Steve Mattox. Mr. Mattox has lived in Minonk 3 and 1/2 years and is a captain at the Pontiac Prison. I strongly believe that Dean Barth deserves another term as councilman. He has been a lone wolf at many of the council sessions because he is not afraid to challenge those who he feels have a private agenda that is not in the best interests of the city. Dean represents a generation of Minonk that remembers what Minonk used to be like and would like Minonk to regain the lustre that it has lost over the past 40 years. It takes guts to go to each council session knowing that you will be confronted or contradicted by your peers. However, Dean is doing what he feels is in the best interest of the average citizen of Minonk, not the few. I salute him for his courage and his perserverance. Dean has been the president of the Westside Park Pavilion Committee and would like to remain on the council to see the construction of the pavilion completed during his watch. He has been a volunteer and servant to this community all of his life. Unlike most other council members and city officials, he mixes with the public on a daily basis in Minonk. His desire to continue to serve should be honored by having voters in Ward 2 cast their write-in vote for Dean Barth on April 1. |
| To reply to this editorial please send your comments to duphoff@minonktalk.com. Your letter will be published in the email section. Viewers are welcome to submit a guest editorial. |